DomainsData.org: Braam Kids Homepage - Foster Care Reform in Washington State
-
Title:Braam Kids Homepage - Foster Care Reform in Washington State
-
Age:11 years old
-
Alexa Rank:
-
Total Sites Linking In (Alexa):5
-
Domain's IP Country:
-
Status Code:OK
-
IP Address:64.29.151.221
-
Description:Braam foster care reform Washington Washington State The Braam Oversight Panel was created in 2004 to oversee a Settlement regarding Washington Stateâs foster care system. The Settlement was reached after a six-year period of litigation. The named Plaintiff, Jessica Braam, is an adult who lived in 34 foster homes by the time the suit was filed in 1998. The Settlement is intended to improve the conditions and treatment of children in the custody of the stateâs Division of Children and Family Services. The Panel was created to monitor improvements in selected services and ensure quality standards are met over the next seven years. This independent Panel was mutually selected by the parties (the Plaintiffs who filed the lawsuit and the state of Washington). The Panel, working in collaboration with the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) and with substantial input from the Plaintiffs and other stakeholders, developed an Implementation Plan for the six areas specified in the Settlement. This document is the first monitoring report on the Settlement and covers the period 7/31/04 to 12/31/05. Members John Landsverk, Chair Jeanine Long Jan McCarthy Jess McDonald Dorothy Roberts Roxanne Lieb, Executive Coordinator 110 Fifth Avenue SE, 2nd Floor PO Box 40999 Olympia, WA 98504-0999 Phone: (360) 586-2768 FAX: (360) 586-2793 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.braampanel.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Background 1 Overview 3 Approach and Summary Findings 5 Placement Stability 7 Mental Health 13 Foster Parent Training and Information 15 Unsafe/Inappropriate Placements 21 Sibling Separation 25 Services to Adolescents 29 [Page left blank intentionally.] BACKGROUND The Braam Oversight Panel was created in 2004 to oversee a Settlement regarding Washington Stateâs foster care system. The Settlement was reached after a six-year period of litigation between the state of Washington and Plaintiffsâ attorneys. The lead named Plaintiff, Jessica Braam, is an adult who lived in 34 foster homes by the time the suit was filed in 1998. The goal of the Settlement is to improve the âconditions and treatment of children in the custody of the stateâs Division of Children and Family Services.â In collaboration with Washingtonâs Department of Social and Health Services (the Department), and with substantial input from Plaintiffs and other stakeholders, the independent Panel has responsibility to develop outcomes, benchmarks, and action steps, and to monitor compliance. The Settlement covers six areas: ⢠Placement stability ⢠Mental health services ⢠Foster parent training and information ⢠Unsafe or inappropriate placements ⢠Sibling separation ⢠Services to adolescents The Settlement is a 16-page document with 14 goals. The Settlement incorporated over 50 provisions directly from the Departmentâs comprehensive reform planâKids Come First II. This restructuring plan for childrenâs services is described by the Department as an âaggressive effort to make long-lasting changes in the child welfare field [that] will further protect children and better address their medical and emotional needs.â To a significant extent, the Settlement directs the Department to perform activities required under Washington State law. Since 1987, 30 laws have been passed directing policies and procedures included in the Settlement. The Panel provided an Implementation Plan in February 2006 that defines the specific and enforceable agreements required by the Settlement. This monitoring report covers performance under the Settlement from 7/31/04 through 12/31/05. [Page left blank intentionally.] OVERVIEW The Braam Oversight Panel was created in 2004 to oversee a settlement agreement (Settlement) regarding Washington Stateâs foster care system. The Settlement was reached after a six-year period of litigation. The parties to the Settlement include the Plaintiffs, who filed the lawsuit, and the State of Washington, respondents to the lawsuit. The final Settlement created an independent oversight panel (the âPanelâ) that was mutually selected by the parties. The members include: ⢠A former child welfare administrator; ⢠A child welfare researcher; ⢠An expert in childrenâs mental health; and ⢠Two additional members. To ensure the Panelâs independence, its members and staff are not funded by the state. The Settlement directed the Panel to establish professional standards, outcomes, benchmarks, and action steps to improve the treatment of, and conditions for, children in the custody of DCFS, and to monitor the Departmentâs performance under this Settlement (Settlement, page 1). The intent of the Settlement, and the Panelâs work, is summarized on the first page of the Settlement: âThe parties enter into this Agreement with the recognition that both parties and their counsel have committed to enter into specific, measurable, and enforceable agreements with the goal of improving the conditions and treatment of children in the custody of the Division of Children and Family Services.â Over 50 provisions from the Departmentâs comprehensive reform plan for childrenâs servicesâKids Come First IIâwere incorporated directly into the Settlement. This plan assimilates the stateâs response to the Settlement, the Federal Child and Family Services Review, and the Gomez Fatality Review. The Department described the plan as a âbold long-term roadmap for creating and sustaining an improved child welfare system.â Settlement Definitions The Settlement defines the Plaintiff class as follows: ⢠âChildâ or âChildrenâ in foster care means children in the custody of DCFS. For the outcomes, benchmarks, and actions steps, this term refers to children in the Plaintiff Class, defined as all children in the custody of DCFS who are now or in the future will be placed by DCFS in three or more placements and those children in the custody of DCFS who are at risk of three or more placements. The Panel interprets this definition to include all children in the custody of DCFS. ⢠âDepartmentâ means the Department of Social and Health Services. In terms of responsibilities related to the Settlement, the most relevant divisions are the Childrenâs Administration and Health and Recovery Services (including the Division of Mental Health and the Division of Alcohol and Substance Abuse). The Settlement established goals in six areas : ⢠Placement Stability: Every child will have a safe and stable placement with a caregiver capable of meeting the childâs needs. ⢠Mental Health: Children shall have initial physical and mental health screenings within 30 days of entry into care. The childâs case plan will include plans to meet their special needs. Children shall receive timely, accessible, individualized, and appropriate mental health assessments and treatment by qualified mental health providers. Continuity of treatment providers will be maintained. ⢠Foster Parent Training and Information: Caregivers shall be adequately trained, supported, and informed about children in their care. The Department shall provide accessible pre-service and in-service training to all caregivers sufficient to meet the caregiving needs of children in placement. ⢠Unsafe/Inappropriate Placements: All children shall be placed in safe placements. The state shall continue to meet or exceed the federal standard for out-of-home care. ⢠Sibling Separation: Placement of siblings together is presumed to be in the childrenâs best interest unless there is a reasonable basis to conclude that the health, safety, or welfare of a child is put in jeopardy by the placement. Frequent and meaningful contact between siblings in foster care who are not placed together and those who remain at home should occur unless not in childâs best interest. ⢠Services to Adolescents: Improve the quality and accessibility of services to adolescents. Improve the educational achievements of these adolescents and better prepare them to live independently. Reduce the number of adolescents on runaway status from foster care. Panel Work Products Under the Settlement, the Panel issues the following types of documents: ï Implementation Plan defining the specific and enforceable performances required by the Settlement; and ï Monitoring (Progress) Reports measuring progress toward the Settlement goals, outcomes, benchmarks, and action steps for each six-month period. Implementation Plan. An implementation plan was issued in February 2006. Monitoring Reports. The Panel is to publish progress reports every six months. This March document is the first of these documents.
-
Keywords:Braam foster care reform Washington Washington State The Braam Oversight Panel was created in 2004 to oversee a Settlement regarding Washington Stateâs foster care system. The Settlement was reached after a six-year period of litigation. The named Plaintiff, Jessica Braam, is an adult who lived in 34 foster homes by the time the suit was filed in 1998. The Settlement is intended to improve the conditions and treatment of children in the custody of the stateâs Division of Children and Family Services. The Panel was created to monitor improvements in selected services and ensure quality standards are met over the next seven years. This independent Panel was mutually selected by the parties (the Plaintiffs who filed the lawsuit and the state of Washington). The Panel, working in collaboration with the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) and with substantial input from the Plaintiffs and other stakeholders, developed an Implementation Plan for the six areas specified in the Settlement. This document is the first monitoring report on the Settlement and covers the period 7/31/04 to 12/31/05. Members John Landsverk, Chair Jeanine Long Jan McCarthy Jess McDonald Dorothy Roberts Roxanne Lieb, Executive Coordinator 110 Fifth Avenue SE, 2nd Floor PO Box 40999 Olympia, WA 98504-0999 Phone: (360) 586-2768 FAX: (360) 586-2793 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.braampanel.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Background 1 Overview 3 Approach and Summary Findings 5 Placement Stability 7 Mental Health 13 Foster Parent Training and Information 15 Unsafe/Inappropriate Placements 21 Sibling Separation 25 Services to Adolescents 29 [Page left blank intentionally.] BACKGROUND The Braam Oversight Panel was created in 2004 to oversee a Settlement regarding Washington Stateâs foster care system. The Settlement was reached after a six-year period of litigation between the state of Washington and Plaintiffsâ attorneys. The lead named Plaintiff, Jessica Braam, is an adult who lived in 34 foster homes by the time the suit was filed in 1998. The goal of the Settlement is to improve the âconditions and treatment of children in the custody of the stateâs Division of Children and Family Services.â In collaboration with Washingtonâs Department of Social and Health Services (the Department), and with substantial input from Plaintiffs and other stakeholders, the independent Panel has responsibility to develop outcomes, benchmarks, and action steps, and to monitor compliance. The Settlement covers six areas: ⢠Placement stability ⢠Mental health services ⢠Foster parent training and information ⢠Unsafe or inappropriate placements ⢠Sibling separation ⢠Services to adolescents The Settlement is a 16-page document with 14 goals. The Settlement incorporated over 50 provisions directly from the Departmentâs comprehensive reform planâKids Come First II. This restructuring plan for childrenâs services is described by the Department as an âaggressive effort to make long-lasting changes in the child welfare field [that] will further protect children and better address their medical and emotional needs.â To a significant extent, the Settlement directs the Department to perform activities required under Washington State law. Since 1987, 30 laws have been passed directing policies and procedures included in the Settlement. The Panel provided an Implementation Plan in February 2006 that defines the specific and enforceable agreements required by the Settlement. This monitoring report covers performance under the Settlement from 7/31/04 through 12/31/05. [Page left blank intentionally.] OVERVIEW The Braam Oversight Panel was created in 2004 to oversee a settlement agreement (Settlement) regarding Washington Stateâs foster care system. The Settlement was reached after a six-year period of litigation. The parties to the Settlement include the Plaintiffs, who filed the lawsuit, and the State of Washington, respondents to the lawsuit. The final Settlement created an independent oversight panel (the âPanelâ) that was mutually selected by the parties. The members include: ⢠A former child welfare administrator; ⢠A child welfare researcher; ⢠An expert in childrenâs mental health; and ⢠Two additional members. To ensure the Panelâs independence, its members and staff are not funded by the state. The Settlement directed the Panel to establish professional standards, outcomes, benchmarks, and action steps to improve the treatment of, and conditions for, children in the custody of DCFS, and to monitor the Departmentâs performance under this Settlement (Settlement, page 1). The intent of the Settlement, and the Panelâs work, is summarized on the first page of the Settlement: âThe parties enter into this Agreement with the recognition that both parties and their counsel have committed to enter into specific, measurable, and enforceable agreements with the goal of improving the conditions and treatment of children in the custody of the Division of Children and Family Services.â Over 50 provisions from the Departmentâs comprehensive reform plan for childrenâs servicesâKids Come First IIâwere incorporated directly into the Settlement. This plan assimilates the stateâs response to the Settlement, the Federal Child and Family Services Review, and the Gomez Fatality Review. The Department described the plan as a âbold long-term roadmap for creating and sustaining an improved child welfare system.â Settlement Definitions The Settlement defines the Plaintiff class as follows: ⢠âChildâ or âChildrenâ in foster care means children in the custody of DCFS. For the outcomes, benchmarks, and actions steps, this term refers to children in the Plaintiff Class, defined as all children in the custody of DCFS who are now or in the future will be placed by DCFS in three or more placements and those children in the custody of DCFS who are at risk of three or more placements. The Panel interprets this definition to include all children in the custody of DCFS. ⢠âDepartmentâ means the Department of Social and Health Services. In terms of responsibilities related to the Settlement, the most relevant divisions are the Childrenâs Administration and Health and Recovery Services (including the Division of Mental Health and the Division of Alcohol and Substance Abuse). The Settlement established goals in six areas : ⢠Placement Stability: Every child will have a safe and stable placement with a caregiver capable of meeting the childâs needs. ⢠Mental Health: Children shall have initial physical and mental health screenings within 30 days of entry into care. The childâs case plan will include plans to meet their special needs. Children shall receive timely, accessible, individualized, and appropriate mental health assessments and treatment by qualified mental health providers. Continuity of treatment providers will be maintained. ⢠Foster Parent Training and Information: Caregivers shall be adequately trained, supported, and informed about children in their care. The Department shall provide accessible pre-service and in-service training to all caregivers sufficient to meet the caregiving needs of children in placement. ⢠Unsafe/Inappropriate Placements: All children shall be placed in safe placements. The state shall continue to meet or exceed the federal standard for out-of-home care. ⢠Sibling Separation: Placement of siblings together is presumed to be in the childrenâs best interest unless there is a reasonable basis to conclude that the health, safety, or welfare of a child is put in jeopardy by the placement. Frequent and meaningful contact between siblings in foster care who are not placed together and those who remain at home should occur unless not in childâs best interest. ⢠Services to Adolescents: Improve the quality and accessibility of services to adolescents. Improve the educational achievements of these adolescents and better prepare them to live independently. Reduce the number of adolescents on runaway status from foster care. Panel Work Products Under the Settlement, the Panel issues the following types of documents: ï Implementation Plan defining the specific and enforceable performances required by the Settlement; and ï Monitoring (Progress) Reports measuring progress toward the Settlement goals, outcomes, benchmarks, and action steps for each six-month period. Implementation Plan. An implementation plan was issued in February 2006. Monitoring Reports. The Panel is to publish progress reports every six months. This March document is the first of these documents.
-
1.Domain Name:braamkids.org
-
2.Domain Age:11 years old
-
3.Name Server 1:ns2.abac.com
-
4.Name Server 2:ns1.abac.com
-
5.Created:Tuesday 27. September 2005
-
6.Expires:Wednesday 27. September 2017
-
7.Domain Registrar:Melbourne IT, Ltd
-
1.Ip Address:64.29.151.221
-
2.Country:United States
-
3.Status Code:OK
-
4.Region Name:Florida
-
5.City Name:Fort Lauderdale
-
6.Zip Code:33301
-
7.Speed test:not available
-
5 Websites linking to braamkids.org:
- columbialegal.org
- heal-online.org
- jakedekker.com
- kidsfirst-ic.org
- rosshunter.com
-
Websites related to braamkids.org:
-
Top Keywords from Search Engines:
-
child health care lawsuit washington state, child mental health care lawsuit washington state, child mental health care t.r. v. dreyfus washington state
-
This is a screenshot of braamkids.org, created on Monday 31. October 2016
Click on thumb to enlarge the screenshot.
-
This is a Google Top 10 results' screenshot for keyword Braam Kids Homepage created on Monday 31. October 2016.
The position for keyword Braam Kids Homepage is: 1
Google Ranking Position checked from US (United States of America) Ip Address on Monday 31. October 2016.
Click on thumb to enlarge the screenshot.
graamkids.org
vraamkids.org
fraamkids.org
nraamkids.org
hraamkids.org
b4aamkids.org
bfaamkids.org
beaamkids.org
b3aamkids.org
bdaamkids.org
btaamkids.org
b5aamkids.org
bgaamkids.org
brqamkids.org
brzamkids.org
brsamkids.org
brwamkids.org
brxamkids.org
braqmkids.org
brazmkids.org
brasmkids.org
brawmkids.org
braxmkids.org
braajkids.org
braankids.org
braahkids.org
braakkids.org
braamiids.org
braamjids.org
braamuids.org
braammids.org
braamlids.org
braamoids.org
braam.ids.org
braamk8ds.org
braamkkds.org
braamkuds.org
braamk7ds.org
braamkjds.org
braamkods.org
braamk9ds.org
braamklds.org
braamkies.org
braamkics.org
braamkiss.org
braamkiws.org
braamkixs.org
braamkifs.org
braamkirs.org
braamkivs.org
braamkidw.org
braamkidx.org
braamkida.org
braamkidq.org
braamkidz.org
braamkidd.org
braamkide.org
braamkidc.org
braamkids.9rg
braamkids.lrg
braamkids.irg
braamkids.8rg
braamkids.krg
braamkids.prg
braamkids.0rg
braamkids.o4g
braamkids.ofg
braamkids.oeg
braamkids.o3g
braamkids.odg
braamkids.otg
braamkids.o5g
braamkids.ogg
braamkids.ort
braamkids.orb
braamkids.orf
braamkids.orr
braamkids.orv
braamkids.orh
braamkids.ory
braamkids.orn
braamkids.biz
braamkids.org
braamkids.info
braamkids.net
braamkids.com
braamkids.us
braamkids.in
braamkids.co.uk
braamkids.au
braamkids.ca
braamcids.org
bramkids.org
-
cane-corso.it domain report |
awfulstuff.com domain report |
prochoiceaction.org domain report |
useice.com domain report |
nishantengineers.com domain report |
circa50.com domain report |
tinywebtools.com domain report |
mix.si domain report |
complete-baseball.com domain report |
futures-data.com domain report |
diabete.fr domain report |
terres-cuites-de-legrin.com domain report |
connectingpoint.net domain report |
tippettschapel.com domain report |
sherrymullinshomes.com domain report |
barongroup.com domain report |
leproton.com domain report |
iteachnet.org domain report |
gladur.org domain report |
shoarefs.org domain report |
rpb-law.com domain report |
sunline.org domain report |
hoytakpoolom.org domain report |
dataway.com domain report |
dasotech.se domain report |
danceforyou-magazine.com domain report |
tedzaroff.com domain report |
firestation10.com domain report |
hostagrowers.org domain report |
sieversretrievers.com domain report |
sakurataisen.com domain report |
westernmilling.com domain report |
cutemena.com domain report |
fabricflameproofingco.com domain report |
loudobbsradio.com domain report |
ouwet.com domain report |
creativebackdrops.com domain report |
scgtc.com domain report |
patrickswellgaa.com domain report |
kenschatz.com domain report |
miafoundation.org domain report |
cruiselive.net domain report |
btppv.com domain report |
edcknives.com domain report |
oftalmoconfia.com domain report |
techlf.com domain report |
valders.org domain report |
xte.com domain report |
bostonbeyond.org domain report |
namebase.org domain report |